askjesse
Please remember that you are choosing to read my opinions.
Election Coverage: My Response
I've been hearing a lot of odd talk coming out of the spin rooms this morning about the election. I have to disagree with most of the conclusions people are trying to draw from the race so far.
One is that Barack Obama is too timid to take on McCain, because he isn't campaigning as aggressively (in the negative sense) as Hilary Clinton. This is a bad conclusion to make, because campaigning against your own party is much different than campaigning against a true rival. Obama has no real incentive to attack Clinton. I don't doubt that, when the time comes, Obama will do just fine pointing out the uselessness of McCain, who will just continue the current failed policies of Bush.
The other conclusion being drawn is that the states that Clinton is winning are the big states for voter turnout in the General Election. New York, California, New Jersey, etc.... The flaw in this argument is that these states are going to be taken by Democrats anyway, as usual. McCain doesn't stand a chance in certain states, just as the Democratic Nominee doesn't stand a chance in certain other states.
This list is my interpretation of the "red state vs. blue state" situation. It might not look exactly like other lists of red and blue states because I made this list myself. I've labeled them so they are fairly self-explanatory. I compiled this list for the general election, and while compiling it, I realized that certain states tend to be good at picking the winning nominee (at least since 1968), so I listed their predictive value as well. Whether or not there is any predictive value, I leave that up to you. I am personally undecided. But I plan on watching a few of the "great predictors" to see if they do the same this year.
However, I must note... most of the states that I list as "true swing states" have voted Republican in 2000 and 2004. While this denotes a "predictive" value, it also denotes a Republican leaning as well.
So as you can see, there are relatively few states that are likely to change the way they vote. In my opinion, Obama has a better chance of bringing in the undecided/independent votes, so he would actually be the stronger nominee against John McCain.
Comments?
One is that Barack Obama is too timid to take on McCain, because he isn't campaigning as aggressively (in the negative sense) as Hilary Clinton. This is a bad conclusion to make, because campaigning against your own party is much different than campaigning against a true rival. Obama has no real incentive to attack Clinton. I don't doubt that, when the time comes, Obama will do just fine pointing out the uselessness of McCain, who will just continue the current failed policies of Bush.
The other conclusion being drawn is that the states that Clinton is winning are the big states for voter turnout in the General Election. New York, California, New Jersey, etc.... The flaw in this argument is that these states are going to be taken by Democrats anyway, as usual. McCain doesn't stand a chance in certain states, just as the Democratic Nominee doesn't stand a chance in certain other states.
This list is my interpretation of the "red state vs. blue state" situation. It might not look exactly like other lists of red and blue states because I made this list myself. I've labeled them so they are fairly self-explanatory. I compiled this list for the general election, and while compiling it, I realized that certain states tend to be good at picking the winning nominee (at least since 1968), so I listed their predictive value as well. Whether or not there is any predictive value, I leave that up to you. I am personally undecided. But I plan on watching a few of the "great predictors" to see if they do the same this year.
However, I must note... most of the states that I list as "true swing states" have voted Republican in 2000 and 2004. While this denotes a "predictive" value, it also denotes a Republican leaning as well.
| New Hampshire | | leaning democrat (fair predictor) |
| New Jersy | | Moderate Democrat |
| Florida | | Republican Leaning Swing state (good predictor) |
| Mass. | | Strong Democrat |
| Delaware | | Strong Democrat |
| DC | | Strong Democrat |
| Illinois | | Strong Democrat |
| Vermont | | Strong Democrat |
| Hawaii | | Strong Democrat |
| California | | Strong Democrat |
| Connecticut | | Strong Democrat |
| Washington | | Strong Democrat |
| Rhode Island | | Strong Democrat |
| Maine | | Strong Democrat |
| New York | | Strong Democrat |
| Wisconsin | | Strong Democrat |
| Maryland | | Strong Democrat |
| Minnesota | | Strong Democrat |
| Oregon | | Strong Democrat |
| Michigan | | Strong Democrat |
| Kansas | | Strong Republican |
| Alabama | | Strong Republican |
| Indiana | | Strong Republican |
| Alaska | | Strong Republican |
| Georgia | | Strong Republican |
| Idaho | | Strong Republican |
| Arizona | | Strong Republican |
| Nebraska | | Strong Republican |
| Montana | | Strong Republican |
| Colorado | | Strong Republican |
| North Dakota | | Strong Republican |
| North Carolina | | Strong Republican |
| Oklahoma | | Strong Republican |
| Wyoming | | Strong Republican |
| Virginia | | Strong Republican |
| Utah | | Strong Republican |
| Texas | | Strong Republican |
| South Carolina | | Strong Republican |
| Mississippi | | Strong Republican |
| South Dakota | | Strong Republican |
| Ohio | | True Swing State (Great predictor) |
| Tennessee | | True Swing State (Great predictor) |
| Louisiana | | True Swing State (good predictor) |
| Missouri | | True swing State (good predictor) |
| Kentucky | | True Swing State (great predictor) |
| Arkansas | | True Swing State (great predictor) |
| Nevada | | True Swing State (good predictor) |
| Pennsylvania | | Weak Democrat. |
| West Virginia | | Weak Republican |
| New Mexico | | Weak Republican (voted for D 2000, R 2004) |
| Iowa | | Weak Republican, (fair predictor) |
So as you can see, there are relatively few states that are likely to change the way they vote. In my opinion, Obama has a better chance of bringing in the undecided/independent votes, so he would actually be the stronger nominee against John McCain.
Comments?
In the SPOTLIGHT
Odds & Ends
* Blogging Tips !
* Sign my yearbook!
- Archive: Happy Earth Day
Archive: Happy Earth Day
Archive: Important Facts About Canada
Archive: Independence Day
Archive: Is there Intelligent life on earth?
Archive: Let the Questions Guide You -1- (cutting)
Archive: Let the Questions Guide You revisited -2- (cutting)
Archive: Letter to Clonaid
Archive: Popularity
Archive: Rainy Day Observation
Archive: Screen Names, Labels...
Archive: Separation of Church and State
Archive: Stupid White Men
Archive: The Awareness of our Mortality
Archive: The Evils of Harry Potter
Archive: Where do you Stand?
Homestarrunner.com
Johnalism.com: The Doc is In
Terrorists
Barely Know 'em
November 15th
Andreux
November 4th
laughwithme
November 3rd
laughwithme
October 29th
October 15th
asdfghjkldani
October 7th
jimshields
September 28th
argonsax
September 26th
argonsax
September 25th
argonsax
politics