Please remember that you are choosing to read my opinions.

What is worse, calling someone a monster or calling them Kenneth Starr?

Update:

According to Clinton, monster ("...a monster... who will do anything to win") is an ad hominem attack, while the other ("...I don't see how anyone who would imitate Kenneth Starr can win the Democratic presidential...") is an historical reference.

The double standard aside, why would you, as Hilary Clinton, want to bring up that particular moment in history?